Everything we know about Apple’s C1 5G modem in iPhone 16e

There’s a lot to like about Apple’s newest $599 iPhone 16e, but one of the more interesting features in the device is the Apple-designed 5G modem. Apple has spent at least seven years developing the chip, but gave it just a few short seconds of time when it announced the smartphone this week. (That’s not a great deal of time for a component that represents such a design challenge.)

Here is what we know so far about Apple’s all-new C1 subsystem.

Introducing the C1 chip

At the heart of the system, the C1 (Cellular 1) chip first appears in the iPhone 16e. It is also expected to debut in other Apple devices in the coming months and will likely see use across all or most of the iPhone range by this time next year. Apple calls it “the most power efficient modem ever in an iPhone.” 

The reason it can say that is that the modem integrates with both the hardware and software on the Apple device. That integration lets it optimize the relationship between all the components, unleashing better performance and power efficiency. It’s also what makes the iPhone 16e so power efficient.

There’s another advantage. Apple can optimize device processes, including through the use of machine learning and AI. A Reuters report explains that if an iPhone with the chip finds itself on a congested data network, the processor can tell the modem what traffic is the most important to handle first, which means the tasks you really want to transact will be completed that little bit more swiftly.  

What Apple said about the C1

Apple Senior Vice President of Hardware Technologies Johny Srouji explained how Apple sees this latest addition to the company’s growing processor family.  “We build a platform for generations,” Srouji said. “C1 is the start, and we’re going to keep improving that technology each generation, so that it becomes a platform for us that will be used to truly differentiate this technology for our products.”

Srouji also stressed that the company doesn’t aim to match all the specifications of other modems from other manufacturers. That’s because the company’s business isn’t modem manufacture, but to design products for which the modem is a component. The aim, I expect, will be to deliver the best connected devices offering optimizations that just aren’t possible unless you design the hardware and software used.

Right now, that’s evident in energy consumption; I’m guessing that as the company finds a way to optimize the designs and further miniaturize the transceiver, we can anticipate performance and speed to also see significant improvements. These are, after all, the typical benefits Apple continues to realize through the move to Apple Silicon.

Power efficiency

Power efficiency is the big result from this chip. It means you get 26 hours of video playback in the iPhone 16e. And over the next year or two, all those complaints about iPhone battery life are likely to fade because Apple’s future devices will offer the best battery life in the business while also using less energy. (This should also extend physical battery life.)

For now, the iPhone 16e delivers the same video playback, more streamed video playback, similar audio playback and will fast charge more swiftly than the iPhone 14 Plus. What kind of power efficiency might a C1 “Pro” in future higher-end devices achieve? Can we anticipate iPhones with 30+-hour battery life? It’s not unreasonable to do so.

The C1 also isn’t precisely a single chip, but is instead a system of multiple chips, including the transceiver and baseband chips that connect using PCIe. This should make for better power delivery when you use the device in the sun or cold. So, when you use your iPhone’s 5G modem for serious work, such as downloading data via 5G, you might well find your device gets less hot and uses less energy during the process. That’s going to be good for all kinds of remote work.

Engineering

Apple isn’t coming in blind with its 5G chip. It claims the modem was tested with 180 carriers in 55 countries to ensure it works wherever Apple ships iPhones. While actual results will vary, it’s a reassuring starting point. The C1 chip is a complex piece of engineering; its baseband modem is manufactured using advanced 4-nanometer technology, while its transceiver uses 7nm.

Eager to get away from reliance on Qualcomm, Apple has been working to build its own 5G modem since at least 2019, when it purchased Intel’s chip development business for $1 billion. It now joins a small, select group of companies to offer one of these — only Samsung, MediaTek, Huawei, and, of course, Qualcomm have one. The chips also carry GPS systems and support for satellite connectivity, and they handle all the usual 4G/5G frequencies.

Missing the mmWave?

Still, one thing Apple hasn’t put in place is support for Wi-Fi 7 or millimeter wave 5G networks (mmWave). That standard is the fastest form of 5G, but is hampered by a limited range that means you don’t usually get to use it. Even in the US, it isn’t widely available, likely reflecting the cost burden of putting base stations that support it on carrier networks.

Now, we know Apple has spent time working with millimeter wave; we also know Qualcomm holds several patents in the tech. Apple isn’t saying whether it will ever support mmWave, but this might not matter much because it is mostly only used in the US (and not widely). In the UK, the spectrum used for mmWave hasn’t even been released as yet.

Apple may eventually still choose to deploy support for it in a future chip – or invest heavily in 6G development in a bid to hold its own patents in the tech. Wi-Fi 7 is another matter, but again I think that in most cases this matters less.

Why? Because most consumers don’t yet have Wi-Fi 7 at home, and most businesses don’t yet support it. Most consumers haven’t experienced the 46Gbps theoretical max bandwidth of Wi-Fi 7 and are accustomed to the 9.6Gbps of Wi-Fi 6. That’s not saying those of us who do regularly use Wi-Fi 7 won’t miss it; the speed is amazing when you get it.

I suspect Wi-Fi 7 support sits above mmWave on Apple’s C2 development road map.

What about Qualcomm?

It’s no secret that the relationship between Apple and Qualcomm is at times tense. Apple thinks Qualcomm charges too much for patent licenses; they ended up in court over something of that nature. Qualcomm, naturally, disagrees.

History will show that Apple felt sufficiently strongly about this to spend billions of dollars and seven years coming up with its own alternative.

Right now, we expect (because Qualcomm says so) that Apple’s 5G modem will be inside 80% of its products by 2026, with the remaining 20% set to switch the following year, when Apple’s technology licensing agreement with Qualcomm also expires.

There is one caveat – Qualcomm still holds many important 5G patents, and Apple will still need to continue to pay some licensing fees for those patents, similar to the fees it pays Arm for Apple Silicon. What Apple gets for the deal is the chance to make a modem that’s optimized for use in its hardware, rather than off-the-shelf components that never quite deliver the right fit.

See it as the difference between a thrift shop suit and one tailored for you. 

What’s next?

There is and will be plenty of speculation concerning the C-series chips. Will Apple roll the modem system into its core chips to create a highly performant system-on-chip (SoC)? Will it now seek to integrate support for Wi-Fi and Bluetooth within the C1? (Even if it does not, it is expected to switch to its own proprietary chip for both systems this year). Will it eventually field mmWave support? Apple now has an opportunity to further optimize networking across its devices, unleashing positive consequences in power and performance as it does so.  

One more thing: persistent speculation claims Apple plans to introduce a super-thin iPhone special edition of some kind this year. The new modem might be part of what enables such thinness, as during the iPhone 16e launch Apple did say that the new modem let it switch to a new internal design for the device. That implies the company might now be able to unleash thinner, more performant, more power efficient iPhones.

(Personally, I can’t help but wonder if the component will also let Apple introduce a slim, svelte, folding iPhone to compete with Samsung’s chunky but popular Fold — though that speculation is for another day).

Relevant tech specs

Apple has disclosed the following relevant specs to the iPhone 16e.

Model A3212

  • 5G NR (Bands n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n14, n20, n25, n26, n28, n29, n30, n38, n40, n41, n48, n53, n66, n70, n71, n75, n76, n77, n78, n79)
  • FDD‑LTE (Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 66, 71)
  • TD‑LTE (Bands 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53)
  • UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz) 
  • GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)

All models

  • 5G (sub-6 GHz) with 4×4 MIMO
  • Gigabit LTE with 4×4 MIMO
  • Wi‑Fi 6 (802.11ax) with 2×2 MIMO
  • Bluetooth 5.3
  • Express Cards with power reserve
  • GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou, and NavIC
  • Digital compass
  • Wi‑Fi
  • iBeacon microlocation

You can follow me on social media! Join me on BlueSky,  LinkedInMastodon, and MeWe

Everything we know about Apple’s C1 5G modem in iPhone 16e

There’s a lot to like about Apple’s newest $599 iPhone 16e, but one of the more interesting features in the device is the Apple-designed 5G modem. Apple has spent at least seven years developing the chip, but gave it just a few short seconds of time when it announced the smartphone this week. (That’s not a great deal of time for a component that represents such a design challenge.)

Here is what we know so far about Apple’s all-new C1 subsystem.

Introducing the C1 chip

At the heart of the system, the C1 (Cellular 1) chip first appears in the iPhone 16e. It is also expected to debut in other Apple devices in the coming months and will likely see use across all or most of the iPhone range by this time next year. Apple calls it “the most power efficient modem ever in an iPhone.” 

The reason it can say that is that the modem integrates with both the hardware and software on the Apple device. That integration lets it optimize the relationship between all the components, unleashing better performance and power efficiency. It’s also what makes the iPhone 16e so power efficient.

There’s another advantage. Apple can optimize device processes, including through the use of machine learning and AI. A Reuters report explains that if an iPhone with the chip finds itself on a congested data network, the processor can tell the modem what traffic is the most important to handle first, which means the tasks you really want to transact will be completed that little bit more swiftly.  

What Apple said about the C1

Apple Senior Vice President of Hardware Technologies Johny Srouji explained how Apple sees this latest addition to the company’s growing processor family.  “We build a platform for generations,” Srouji said. “C1 is the start, and we’re going to keep improving that technology each generation, so that it becomes a platform for us that will be used to truly differentiate this technology for our products.”

Srouji also stressed that the company doesn’t aim to match all the specifications of other modems from other manufacturers. That’s because the company’s business isn’t modem manufacture, but to design products for which the modem is a component. The aim, I expect, will be to deliver the best connected devices offering optimizations that just aren’t possible unless you design the hardware and software used.

Right now, that’s evident in energy consumption; I’m guessing that as the company finds a way to optimize the designs and further miniaturize the transceiver, we can anticipate performance and speed to also see significant improvements. These are, after all, the typical benefits Apple continues to realize through the move to Apple Silicon.

Power efficiency

Power efficiency is the big result from this chip. It means you get 26 hours of video playback in the iPhone 16e. And over the next year or two, all those complaints about iPhone battery life are likely to fade because Apple’s future devices will offer the best battery life in the business while also using less energy. (This should also extend physical battery life.)

For now, the iPhone 16e delivers the same video playback, more streamed video playback, similar audio playback and will fast charge more swiftly than the iPhone 14 Plus. What kind of power efficiency might a C1 “Pro” in future higher-end devices achieve? Can we anticipate iPhones with 30+-hour battery life? It’s not unreasonable to do so.

The C1 also isn’t precisely a single chip, but is instead a system of multiple chips, including the transceiver and baseband chips that connect using PCIe. This should make for better power delivery when you use the device in the sun or cold. So, when you use your iPhone’s 5G modem for serious work, such as downloading data via 5G, you might well find your device gets less hot and uses less energy during the process. That’s going to be good for all kinds of remote work.

Engineering

Apple isn’t coming in blind with its 5G chip. It claims the modem was tested with 180 carriers in 55 countries to ensure it works wherever Apple ships iPhones. While actual results will vary, it’s a reassuring starting point. The C1 chip is a complex piece of engineering; its baseband modem is manufactured using advanced 4-nanometer technology, while its transceiver uses 7nm.

Eager to get away from reliance on Qualcomm, Apple has been working to build its own 5G modem since at least 2019, when it purchased Intel’s chip development business for $1 billion. It now joins a small, select group of companies to offer one of these — only Samsung, MediaTek, Huawei, and, of course, Qualcomm have one. The chips also carry GPS systems and support for satellite connectivity, and they handle all the usual 4G/5G frequencies.

Missing the mmWave?

Still, one thing Apple hasn’t put in place is support for Wi-Fi 7 or millimeter wave 5G networks (mmWave). That standard is the fastest form of 5G, but is hampered by a limited range that means you don’t usually get to use it. Even in the US, it isn’t widely available, likely reflecting the cost burden of putting base stations that support it on carrier networks.

Now, we know Apple has spent time working with millimeter wave; we also know Qualcomm holds several patents in the tech. Apple isn’t saying whether it will ever support mmWave, but this might not matter much because it is mostly only used in the US (and not widely). In the UK, the spectrum used for mmWave hasn’t even been released as yet.

Apple may eventually still choose to deploy support for it in a future chip – or invest heavily in 6G development in a bid to hold its own patents in the tech. Wi-Fi 7 is another matter, but again I think that in most cases this matters less.

Why? Because most consumers don’t yet have Wi-Fi 7 at home, and most businesses don’t yet support it. Most consumers haven’t experienced the 46Gbps theoretical max bandwidth of Wi-Fi 7 and are accustomed to the 9.6Gbps of Wi-Fi 6. That’s not saying those of us who do regularly use Wi-Fi 7 won’t miss it; the speed is amazing when you get it.

I suspect Wi-Fi 7 support sits above mmWave on Apple’s C2 development road map.

What about Qualcomm?

It’s no secret that the relationship between Apple and Qualcomm is at times tense. Apple thinks Qualcomm charges too much for patent licenses; they ended up in court over something of that nature. Qualcomm, naturally, disagrees.

History will show that Apple felt sufficiently strongly about this to spend billions of dollars and seven years coming up with its own alternative.

Right now, we expect (because Qualcomm says so) that Apple’s 5G modem will be inside 80% of its products by 2026, with the remaining 20% set to switch the following year, when Apple’s technology licensing agreement with Qualcomm also expires.

There is one caveat – Qualcomm still holds many important 5G patents, and Apple will still need to continue to pay some licensing fees for those patents, similar to the fees it pays Arm for Apple Silicon. What Apple gets for the deal is the chance to make a modem that’s optimized for use in its hardware, rather than off-the-shelf components that never quite deliver the right fit.

See it as the difference between a thrift shop suit and one tailored for you. 

What’s next?

There is and will be plenty of speculation concerning the C-series chips. Will Apple roll the modem system into its core chips to create a highly performant system-on-chip (SoC)? Will it now seek to integrate support for Wi-Fi and Bluetooth within the C1? (Even if it does not, it is expected to switch to its own proprietary chip for both systems this year). Will it eventually field mmWave support? Apple now has an opportunity to further optimize networking across its devices, unleashing positive consequences in power and performance as it does so.  

One more thing: persistent speculation claims Apple plans to introduce a super-thin iPhone special edition of some kind this year. The new modem might be part of what enables such thinness, as during the iPhone 16e launch Apple did say that the new modem let it switch to a new internal design for the device. That implies the company might now be able to unleash thinner, more performant, more power efficient iPhones.

(Personally, I can’t help but wonder if the component will also let Apple introduce a slim, svelte, folding iPhone to compete with Samsung’s chunky but popular Fold — though that speculation is for another day).

Relevant tech specs

Apple has disclosed the following relevant specs to the iPhone 16e.

Model A3212

  • 5G NR (Bands n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n14, n20, n25, n26, n28, n29, n30, n38, n40, n41, n48, n53, n66, n70, n71, n75, n76, n77, n78, n79)
  • FDD‑LTE (Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 66, 71)
  • TD‑LTE (Bands 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53)
  • UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz) 
  • GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)

All models

  • 5G (sub-6 GHz) with 4×4 MIMO
  • Gigabit LTE with 4×4 MIMO
  • Wi‑Fi 6 (802.11ax) with 2×2 MIMO
  • Bluetooth 5.3
  • Express Cards with power reserve
  • GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou, and NavIC
  • Digital compass
  • Wi‑Fi
  • iBeacon microlocation

You can follow me on social media! Join me on BlueSky,  LinkedInMastodon, and MeWe

Everything we know about Apple’s C1 5G modem in iPhone 16e

There’s a lot to like about Apple’s newest $599 iPhone 16e, but one of the more interesting features in the device is the Apple-designed 5G modem. Apple has spent at least seven years developing the chip, but gave it just a few short seconds of time when it announced the smartphone this week. (That’s not a great deal of time for a component that represents such a design challenge.)

Here is what we know so far about Apple’s all-new C1 subsystem.

Introducing the C1 chip

At the heart of the system, the C1 (Cellular 1) chip first appears in the iPhone 16e. It is also expected to debut in other Apple devices in the coming months and will likely see use across all or most of the iPhone range by this time next year. Apple calls it “the most power efficient modem ever in an iPhone.” 

The reason it can say that is that the modem integrates with both the hardware and software on the Apple device. That integration lets it optimize the relationship between all the components, unleashing better performance and power efficiency. It’s also what makes the iPhone 16e so power efficient.

There’s another advantage. Apple can optimize device processes, including through the use of machine learning and AI. A Reuters report explains that if an iPhone with the chip finds itself on a congested data network, the processor can tell the modem what traffic is the most important to handle first, which means the tasks you really want to transact will be completed that little bit more swiftly.  

What Apple said about the C1

Apple Senior Vice President of Hardware Technologies Johny Srouji explained how Apple sees this latest addition to the company’s growing processor family.  “We build a platform for generations,” Srouji said. “C1 is the start, and we’re going to keep improving that technology each generation, so that it becomes a platform for us that will be used to truly differentiate this technology for our products.”

Srouji also stressed that the company doesn’t aim to match all the specifications of other modems from other manufacturers. That’s because the company’s business isn’t modem manufacture, but to design products for which the modem is a component. The aim, I expect, will be to deliver the best connected devices offering optimizations that just aren’t possible unless you design the hardware and software used.

Right now, that’s evident in energy consumption; I’m guessing that as the company finds a way to optimize the designs and further miniaturize the transceiver, we can anticipate performance and speed to also see significant improvements. These are, after all, the typical benefits Apple continues to realize through the move to Apple Silicon.

Power efficiency

Power efficiency is the big result from this chip. It means you get 26 hours of video playback in the iPhone 16e. And over the next year or two, all those complaints about iPhone battery life are likely to fade because Apple’s future devices will offer the best battery life in the business while also using less energy. (This should also extend physical battery life.)

For now, the iPhone 16e delivers the same video playback, more streamed video playback, similar audio playback and will fast charge more swiftly than the iPhone 14 Plus. What kind of power efficiency might a C1 “Pro” in future higher-end devices achieve? Can we anticipate iPhones with 30+-hour battery life? It’s not unreasonable to do so.

The C1 also isn’t precisely a single chip, but is instead a system of multiple chips, including the transceiver and baseband chips that connect using PCIe. This should make for better power delivery when you use the device in the sun or cold. So, when you use your iPhone’s 5G modem for serious work, such as downloading data via 5G, you might well find your device gets less hot and uses less energy during the process. That’s going to be good for all kinds of remote work.

Engineering

Apple isn’t coming in blind with its 5G chip. It claims the modem was tested with 180 carriers in 55 countries to ensure it works wherever Apple ships iPhones. While actual results will vary, it’s a reassuring starting point. The C1 chip is a complex piece of engineering; its baseband modem is manufactured using advanced 4-nanometer technology, while its transceiver uses 7nm.

Eager to get away from reliance on Qualcomm, Apple has been working to build its own 5G modem since at least 2019, when it purchased Intel’s chip development business for $1 billion. It now joins a small, select group of companies to offer one of these — only Samsung, MediaTek, Huawei, and, of course, Qualcomm have one. The chips also carry GPS systems and support for satellite connectivity, and they handle all the usual 4G/5G frequencies.

Missing the mmWave?

Still, one thing Apple hasn’t put in place is support for Wi-Fi 7 or millimeter wave 5G networks (mmWave). That standard is the fastest form of 5G, but is hampered by a limited range that means you don’t usually get to use it. Even in the US, it isn’t widely available, likely reflecting the cost burden of putting base stations that support it on carrier networks.

Now, we know Apple has spent time working with millimeter wave; we also know Qualcomm holds several patents in the tech. Apple isn’t saying whether it will ever support mmWave, but this might not matter much because it is mostly only used in the US (and not widely). In the UK, the spectrum used for mmWave hasn’t even been released as yet.

Apple may eventually still choose to deploy support for it in a future chip – or invest heavily in 6G development in a bid to hold its own patents in the tech. Wi-Fi 7 is another matter, but again I think that in most cases this matters less.

Why? Because most consumers don’t yet have Wi-Fi 7 at home, and most businesses don’t yet support it. Most consumers haven’t experienced the 46Gbps theoretical max bandwidth of Wi-Fi 7 and are accustomed to the 9.6Gbps of Wi-Fi 6. That’s not saying those of us who do regularly use Wi-Fi 7 won’t miss it; the speed is amazing when you get it.

I suspect Wi-Fi 7 support sits above mmWave on Apple’s C2 development road map.

What about Qualcomm?

It’s no secret that the relationship between Apple and Qualcomm is at times tense. Apple thinks Qualcomm charges too much for patent licenses; they ended up in court over something of that nature. Qualcomm, naturally, disagrees.

History will show that Apple felt sufficiently strongly about this to spend billions of dollars and seven years coming up with its own alternative.

Right now, we expect (because Qualcomm says so) that Apple’s 5G modem will be inside 80% of its products by 2026, with the remaining 20% set to switch the following year, when Apple’s technology licensing agreement with Qualcomm also expires.

There is one caveat – Qualcomm still holds many important 5G patents, and Apple will still need to continue to pay some licensing fees for those patents, similar to the fees it pays Arm for Apple Silicon. What Apple gets for the deal is the chance to make a modem that’s optimized for use in its hardware, rather than off-the-shelf components that never quite deliver the right fit.

See it as the difference between a thrift shop suit and one tailored for you. 

What’s next?

There is and will be plenty of speculation concerning the C-series chips. Will Apple roll the modem system into its core chips to create a highly performant system-on-chip (SoC)? Will it now seek to integrate support for Wi-Fi and Bluetooth within the C1? (Even if it does not, it is expected to switch to its own proprietary chip for both systems this year). Will it eventually field mmWave support? Apple now has an opportunity to further optimize networking across its devices, unleashing positive consequences in power and performance as it does so.  

One more thing: persistent speculation claims Apple plans to introduce a super-thin iPhone special edition of some kind this year. The new modem might be part of what enables such thinness, as during the iPhone 16e launch Apple did say that the new modem let it switch to a new internal design for the device. That implies the company might now be able to unleash thinner, more performant, more power efficient iPhones.

(Personally, I can’t help but wonder if the component will also let Apple introduce a slim, svelte, folding iPhone to compete with Samsung’s chunky but popular Fold — though that speculation is for another day).

Relevant tech specs

Apple has disclosed the following relevant specs to the iPhone 16e.

Model A3212

  • 5G NR (Bands n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n14, n20, n25, n26, n28, n29, n30, n38, n40, n41, n48, n53, n66, n70, n71, n75, n76, n77, n78, n79)
  • FDD‑LTE (Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 66, 71)
  • TD‑LTE (Bands 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53)
  • UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz) 
  • GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)

All models

  • 5G (sub-6 GHz) with 4×4 MIMO
  • Gigabit LTE with 4×4 MIMO
  • Wi‑Fi 6 (802.11ax) with 2×2 MIMO
  • Bluetooth 5.3
  • Express Cards with power reserve
  • GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou, and NavIC
  • Digital compass
  • Wi‑Fi
  • iBeacon microlocation

You can follow me on social media! Join me on BlueSky,  LinkedInMastodon, and MeWe

Google’s new AI co-scientist aims to speed up the scientific discovery process

Google has unveiled an AI co-scientist built on its Gemini 2.0 platform, aiming to accelerate scientific research by generating novel hypotheses and refining experiments. While the system shows promise, questions remain about its performance and broader applicability.

The system aims to accelerate scientific discoveries by generating research hypotheses, drafting proposals, and refining experiments.

“The AI co-scientist is a multi-agent AI system that is intended to function as a collaborative tool for scientists,” Google said in a blog post. “Beyond standard literature review, summarization and “deep research” tools, the AI co-scientist system is intended to uncover new, original knowledge and to formulate demonstrably novel research hypotheses and proposals, building upon prior evidence and tailored to specific research objectives.”

The development comes at a time when scientists increasingly struggle with information overload, facing challenges in keeping up with the rapid pace of scientific publications while trying to draw insights from multiple disciplines.

Mixed results in early tests

Early trials yielded mixed results. In tests with 15 research goals, the system outperformed state-of-the-art models according to an Elo rating system. A smaller study involving 11 research goals, evaluated by domain experts, found the outputs novel and potentially impactful. However, the limited scale of human evaluation makes it difficult to draw broad conclusions.

For example, the AI identified potential treatments for liver fibrosis, but Steven O’Reilly of Alcyomics noted in a New Scientist report that the drugs were well established and “there is nothing new here.” However, Gary Peltz of Stanford University found two AI-recommended drugs promising in human liver organoid tests, while his manually selected options were ineffective.

In another case, according to the New Scientist, José Penadés of Imperial College London and his colleagues used the system to explore how mobile genetic elements spread between bacteria. The AI independently proposed a mechanism similar to their recent unpublished discovery, showcasing its ability to synthesize published data into insightful hypotheses.

While Penadés’ team had recently discovered that these elements could utilize tails from different phases, the AI Co-Scientist independently proposed the same mechanism, showcasing its ability to synthesize published data into insightful hypotheses, the New Scientist report added.

Bridging the breadth and depth conundrum

Scientific breakthroughs often emerge from transdisciplinary collaboration. However, researchers face challenges navigating the vast volume of scientific literature while integrating insights from diverse fields.

Inspired by breakthroughs like CRISPR, which combined expertise from microbiology to genetics, Google developed AI Co-Scientist to address these challenges by synthesizing information and uncovering novel knowledge.

The tool, which is still in its experimental phase, allows scientists to input research questions or goals. These agents can also access scientific literature, databases, and tools like Google’s AlphaFold protein-structure prediction system to enhance the quality of their outputs.

“These AI systems play a pivotal role in transforming traditional scientific research processes by accelerating dataset analysis and hypothesis generation, enhancing experimental design through an automated and iterative approach, and fostering a symbiotic collaboration between human researchers and AI systems,” said Charlie Dai, VP and principal analyst at Forrester.

Potential impact on drug discovery

The pharmaceutical industry stands to benefit significantly. By rapidly analyzing scientific literature and databases, the system can propose drug candidates and suggest optimized experimental protocols, potentially reducing research timelines from years to months.

Integration with AlphaFold allows researchers to predict protein structures, essential for developing targeted therapies. This predictive capability helps pharmaceutical companies identify how compounds interact with proteins, expediting the identification of viable drug candidates.

The system’s iterative hypothesis generation and self-refining processes also improve research outcomes, offering greater potential for breakthroughs in treating diseases such as neurodegenerative disorders, rare genetic conditions, and cancer.

“This will result in a surge in both the sheer number of research processes being executed and in concurrency without a proportionate increase in workforce,” said Vershita Srivastava, practice director at Everest Group. “Industries like biotech and pharmaceuticals will achieve innovative breakthroughs at lower costs.”

Looking ahead

While the AI co-scientist shows promise, its real-world impact remains uncertain. Success will depend on its integration into research workflows and its ability to consistently generate valuable insights across diverse scientific domains.

However, challenges remain. Dai warned of risks related to algorithm transparency, inconsistent performance, and reproducibility issues. “While these systems can accelerate discoveries, they also present challenges regarding data integrity, bias, and over-dependence on automation, which may compromise critical thinking,” he said.

Additionally, Srivastava noted that AI’s reliance on specific datasets can reinforce existing biases, potentially constraining discovery. She also highlighted questions about accountability and intellectual property, particularly in heavily regulated and patented industries.

Microsoft’s new AI hub highlights apps that support NPUs

Applications that support the specialized AI chips on Co-Pilot+ PCs have been rare, but Microsoft is looking to change that.

The company this week introduced an upgraded AI Hub that adds new programs to the Microsoft Store that will run on neural processing units (NPUs), the specialized processors in laptops designed to run AI-intensive programs.

The new AI Hub will “provide AI experiences” powered by a PC’s NPU, Microsoft said in a blog post.

The NPU is an ancillary chip to a computer’s CPU and GPU, and is more power efficient when running generative AI (genAI)-based tasks such as image recognition, content creation, and voice transcription.

“The NPU’s ability to offload these tasks from the CPU and GPU allows for faster, more efficient operation of the entire system,” Microsoft said.

Microsoft introduced CoPilot+ PCs last year with NPUs to run genAI tools. The software maker mandated that CoPilot+ PCs include NPUs and that the collective system performance reach 40+ TOPS (trillion operations per second). The first handful of CoPilot+ PCs included chips from Qualcomm and Intel, but the NPUs went largely unutilized.

Some of the apps in Microsoft’s AI Hub include Camo Studio, which speeds up visual effects when using a webcam. (System tests on a Dell XPS 13 laptop with a Qualcomm chipset showed the NPUs in action when the application was running.)

Microsoft rich apps for AI PCs

Microsoft has added apps to its App Store designed for AI PCs.

Microsoft

Microsoft wasn’t ready with NPU-powered applications last year, but decided to launch the CoPilot+ laptops — also called AI PCs — with NPUs, said Mike Feibus, principal analyst at FeibusTech.

The company had a classic chicken-and-egg dilemma of whether to launch the hardware or software first, and moved ahead with the hardware.

The NPU-centric applications could make AI PCs a bit more enticing for buyers, Feibus said. “You have to give developers an ROI reason to develop applications for AI PCs. More PCs with NPUs make it more and more valuable,” he said.

But Microsoft will need a much larger catalog of apps to convince buyers to spend money on CoPilot+ PCs, Feibus said.

Microsoft requires an NPU for its highly touted Recall feature, which stumbled out of the gate following delays related to security, concerns, Feibus said.

Dell is seeing more developers building applications tuned for NPUs.  

“The recent announcements and additions coming to the Copilot+ roadmap also drive more value — things like Click to Do and semantic search will have a big impact on user productivity,” a Dell spokeswoman said via email.

Microsoft had no additional comment about the new AI Hub. 

Qualcomm and Intel are independently encouraging developers to write apps for NPUs. Intel provides developer tools, while Qualcomm has its own AI Hub for developers to write applications for its Snapdragon chipset. 

“Qualcomm supports models from leading AI frameworks enabling developers to work with the model format of their choice and get it up and running on Snapdragon’s NPU. Model formats include ONNX, PyTorch, and TensorFlow Lite,” a Qualcomm spokeswoman said in an emailed comment. 

Federal tech workers in the US may be in ‘a world of hurt’

As federal workers continue to be handed pink slips, IT workers are being caught up in the effort to downsize government agencies — and they’re likely ill-prepared for the job market they’ll face in the private sector.

The Trump Administration, with guidance from Elon Musk’s unofficial “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE), has started significant reductions in the government workforce, including tech professionals. As of Feb. 16, approximately 10,000 federal employees had been laid off, with an additional 75,000 accepting buyout offers. Other reports of more recent cuts are already circulating, which would add to that total.

While the specific number of IT workers affected has not been broken out, agencies such as NASA and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have been hit by sizable cuts. In Houston, NASA employees are facing potential layoffs, with managers at the Johnson Space Center warning probationary workers about imminent terminations, according to various reports. Probationary workers are not necessarily new hires; government workers with years of experience who have received a recent promotion are also considered probationary.

Similarly, the FAA has dismissed hundreds of probationary employees, including those in technical positions crucial for safety.

The broader impact of the workforce reductions is still unfolding, with new details likely to emerge as the situation evolves. But for IT workers being let go from government jobs, the outlook is not good.

More than 70,000 IT jobs were scrubbed from the overall tech job market in the past 24 months, according to data from IT industry research firm Janco Associates. As government workers are released, they will flood the market and find very few opportunities, according to Janco CEO Victor Janulaitis.

There has been “a monumental shift in the IT labor market as AI has taken hold and many legacy positions in the IT function have been automated out of existence,” Janulaitis said.

“For example, try to talk to Microsoft on a technical issue,” he said. “All of their phone numbers have been redirected to websites. This has impacted the US labor market somewhat, but the real unemployment had been in the offshore job markets. Federal IT workers will be in a world of hurt. Many of the systems and support staffs are based on really old legacy technology. Those employees do not have the skills to compete in the AI and LLM job markets.”

IT Jobs

Janco Associates

Peter Miscovich, Global Future of Work Leader at JLL Consulting, agreed that the IT workforce in the US is rapidly changing due to advances in AI, policy shifts, and changing industry needs. Workers, he said, face a paradox: some sectors struggle with talent shortages, while others have an oversupply due to recent layoffs and hiring freezes.

For the IT job market, ‘no significant expansion’ in 2025?

“We may be witnessing the beginning of emerging stagnation in terms of future growth of IT talent demand,” he said. “Several recent projections indicate that there may be no significant expansion within overall IT employment throughout 2025.”

Even so, he said, certain industries are witnessing a surge in demand for tech talent and demand for specialized skills in areas such as AI and machine learning. For example, the retail and hospitality industries saw hiring increase by 38% in the post-pandemic recovery period, while IT and services hiring growth slowed from 19% in December 2024 to 12% last month, Miscovich said.

In addition to potentially lacking skills being sought in the private market, laid off workers are likely to find companies are not hiring as they used to. And newer AI-based tools are being deployed to take the place of “non-critical” staff, low-skilled developers, and entry-level IT jobs such as level one help desk positions.

On top of that, Janulaitis said, CFOs don’t want to expand headcount because doing so represents the greatest cost to an organization. “That is what they are doing to drive costs down,” he said.

In particular, many government IT workers have been sheltered from the rapid change in the market brought about by the arrival of generative AI in the last couple of years; its adoption has reshaped IT hiring across industries. Competition for top AI talent has intensified, with companies offering significant incentives to attract and retain skilled professionals.

Federal tech employees, as is true for most IT workers, will need to upskill or reskill in new technologies such as AI and large language models (LLMs), blockchain, security and compliance, and e-commerce, Janulaitis said.

Miscovich agreed. “Upskilling has emerged as a critical focus area, with 35% of organizations identifying it as a top challenge in the coming year,” he said. “The rapid evolution of technology necessitates continuous learning and adaptation, prompting companies to invest in training programs that align employee competencies with future business needs.”

Technical training schools will likely see a boom, as most universities haven’t updated their courses to match the skills needed in the modern world; that mismatch is likely to soon be a problem.

One bright spot for laid-off IT workers remains with small-to-medium-size businesses, which have been on a hiring spree. Much of that is due to continued layoffs by large enterprises, which flooded the market with IT job-seekers. In the past year, tech giants such as Alphabet (Google), Dell, Intel, Microsoft and Cisco have all announced significant layoffs.

And that was before the recent round of government layoffs.

“In general, we feel there will be some growth in the IT job market over the next few quarters,” Janulaitis said. “Depending on the trends in the ‘Make America Great Again’ [plan], there will be opportunities for skilled and experienced IT professionals.  Day-to-day coders and support staff will have some difficulty — especially if there is an economic downturn. Those will be the first ones to go. 

“Unskilled federal employees will either have to train up or find new career paths.”

Ex-OpenAI CTO Mira Murati launches AI startup, recruits top talent from rivals

Former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati has launched an AI startup, Thinking Machines Lab, escalating the fight for top talent and reshaping competition in the fast-evolving sector.

About 30 researchers and engineers at Thinking Machines Lab previously worked at competitors including OpenAI, Meta, and Mistral, Reuters reported. Former OpenAI employees alone make up about two-thirds of the company.

On its website, Thinking Machines Lab said AI advancements have outpaced scientific understanding, with knowledge concentrated in top research labs, restricting public discourse and accessibility.

“Despite their potential, these systems remain difficult for people to customize to their specific needs and values,” the company added. “To bridge the gaps, we’re building Thinking Machines Lab to make AI systems more widely understood, customizable, and generally capable.”

Former OpenAI employees who have joined Thinking Machines Lab include Barret Zoph, an AI researcher who left OpenAI with Murati in late September, and John Schulman, an OpenAI co-founder who joined Anthropic in August to focus on AI safety.

More OpenAI employees are expected to join Thinking Machines Lab, according to the Reuters report.

AI talent war intensifies

The shift underscores growing competition in the generative AI sector, with top talent moving between established firms and emerging startups.

Analysts expect this trend to continue, driven by demand for cost-effective models and innovative AI solutions.

“Executives and senior technology leaders from major pioneering companies setting up their own ventures is not uncommon in the industry,” said Sharath Srinivasamurthy, associate vice president of Research at IDC. “Also, in the highly dynamic world of AI, talent retention is challenging, and companies should have contingency plans in place to address these kinds of developments.”

In the short term, OpenAI may face challenges in retaining mindshare and employee confidence. However, ongoing investments, backing from Microsoft, and initiatives like Project Stargate reinforce its position as one of the most desirable companies in the AI sector.

“Those who were not aligned with Sam Altman’s (and investors’) vision for OpenAI have left, making the company free of internal politics, power struggles, and other distractions that could slow its progress,” said Neil Shah, partner and co-founder at Counterpoint Research. “In that sense, last year’s exodus may have been a blessing in disguise for OpenAI.”

Hurdles ahead

Developing advanced AI models demands substantial infrastructure and a highly skilled research team, making it a long-term effort.

In contrast to companies like DeepSeek, which aim to challenge OpenAI and other generative AI leaders within a few years, Thinking Machines Lab appears to be taking a longer-term approach.

“While current systems excel at programming and mathematics, we’re building AI that can adapt to the full spectrum of human expertise and enable a broader spectrum of applications,” Thinking Machines Lab noted on its website.

However, it may face significant challenges in the crowded AI startup market, especially given the complexity and long-term nature of AI alignment research, said Charlie Dai, VP and principal analyst at Forrester.

“By leveraging its niche focus, emphasizing ethical AI, and building strategic partnerships, the lab can carve out a unique position and capitalize on the growing importance of AI alignment,” Dai said. “Success will depend on its ability to balance long-term research goals with practical, commercially viable applications.”

However, perhaps the biggest challenge Thinking Machines Lab faces is the apparent ceiling on the utility large foundation models can offer the average user. “The goal of AI alignment with human values is good in theory, but difficult to quantify or qualify as a discrete advantage,” said Hyoun Park, CEO and chief analyst at Amalgam Insights. “In theory, the ability to better align AI to human values could theoretically create a better UX that is more aligned to both help people solve problems or to solve problems in a more human fashion.”  

Apple introduces the iPhone 16e, a fast and powerful mid-range smartphone

Apple’s new iPhone 16e combines three innovations in one $599 package: an A18 chip, Apple’s fast smartphone processor; Apple Intelligence, the company’s private-by-design take on artificial intelligence; and the C1, Apple’s first-ever 5G radio. The announcement confirms all of the speculation made about the device.

In terms of performance-per-watt, Apple’s iPhones — and the iPads and Macs that also use Apple silicon chips — are at the top of their leagues. The 6-core CPU in this new smartphone is up to 80% faster than the A13 Bionic chip in the iPhone 11, Apple said, once again showing how the move to Apple silicon has been a huge success for the company. A 4-core GPU and 16-core Neural Engine completes the set.

But for many industry watchers, the real story will be the new C1 modem.

Apple downplays a 7-year story

Apple has been working to build its own 5G modem for iPhones for years and has spent billions on the challenge. The Apple C1 is the first mass-market public trial of what Apple’s engineers created. That means a lot of people will put the modem through a variety of tests in real-world situations, which means Apple must be confident in what it has introduced. It might also be why the company hasn’t said much about what could be seen as a huge achievement, something that has taken the company seven long years to make. 

The C1 will likely appear in a range of other Apple products down the road — and the lower cost of that component also gives Apple a lot more flexibility when it comes to future product prices. As trade wars and tariffs intensify, that flexibility could make a big difference to Apple’s business moving forward, enabling it to maintain price competitiveness others might be unable to match.  

Apple didn’t discuss any of that, of course, but did point out that the C1 is a low-power component that, when combined with the low energy demands of the A18 chip and the advanced power management of iOS 18, make for significant battery life.  Apple boasted that the smartphone offers the best battery life of any 6.1-in. iPhone, in part due to the low power demands of Apple’s modem. 

All the expectations were correct

With the new device, Apple confirmed all the pre-launch speculation. For example, we had expected an Action button — and Apple came through with that. This button can be customized in Settings and used in numerous ways, to switch between Ring and Silent modes, to turn on the flashlight, recognize music and more. You can also customize it for particular apps, so it offers different functions depending on which app you use. 

The Action button also introduces a new visual intelligence experience that uses Apple Intelligence to help users learn about objects and places. This can summarize and copy text, translate text between languages, detect phone numbers or email addresses with the option to add to contacts, identify an animal or plant, and more. 

What else should we know?

  • The device boasts a 6.1-in. Super Retina XDR display with OLED technology.
  • It supports FaceID rather than Touch ID used in the iPhone SE.
  • It offers the best battery life of any 6.1-in. iPhone, in part due to the low power demands of the C1 modem. 
  • It’s splash, water, and dust resistant, with a rating of IP68.
  • Satellite communication is supported, so you can use Apple’s existing services — Emergency SOS, Roadside Assistance, Messages, and Find My via satellite — when away from conventional 5G or Wi-Fi networks. Access to these features is provided free for two years after purchase.

Apple’s progress toward circular manufacturing is also clear; the device uses over 30% recycled materials overall, including 100% recycled cobalt and 95% recycled lithium in the battery, 85% recycled aluminum in the enclosure, and more. Apple will remove plastic from all its packaging by the end of this year.

And yes, of course, the 16e uses USB-C.

The iPhone 16e starts at $599 and will be available for pre-order on Feb. 21 in white and black with 128GB, 256GB, and 512GB storage capacities. It will be in stores on Feb. 28. In the current environment, price is a big deal, and while it’s up a few dollars from the iPhone SE, Apple’s iPhone 16e hits the market at a good price for a superb mid-range smartphone.  

What Apple said

“iPhone 16e packs in the features our users love about the iPhone 16 lineup, including breakthrough battery life, fast performance powered by the latest-generation A18 chip, an innovative 2-in-1 camera system, and Apple Intelligence,” said Kaiann Drance, Apple’s vice president of worldwide iPhone product marketing. “We’re so excited for iPhone 16e to complete the lineup as a powerful, more affordable option to bring the iPhone experience to even more people.”

You can follow me on social media! Join me on BlueSky,  LinkedInMastodon, and MeWe

iPhones may soon be able to use satellite connections indoors

Sending messages via satellite on iPhones should soon be as easy to as using your mobile network signal, as Apple and satellite partner Globalstar put a new satellite constellation into space.

In an FCC request for authorization, Globalstar shared fresh information on how its new Apple-sponsored C-3 satellite network should provide much more robust connectivity and will be capable of working in cars and buildings. That’s a big deal, as it suggests satellite connections on the iPhone will become much easier; you might not even need to raise your smartphones in supplication to the satellites in the sky.

What Globalstar told us

In its Feb. 14 FCC filing, Globalstar explained that:

  • The C3 satellite constellation will consist of 48 low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites.
  • An additional six spare satellites will also be placed in orbit for backup. 
  • The network will be operated simultaneously and in conjunction with Globalstar’s existing HIBLEO-4 and HIBLEO-X deployments.
  • The global buildout also means 90 new earth station antennas will be put in place at approximately 35 gateway stations situated in at least five nations.
  • The constellation represents a $1 billion expenditure and follows a $1.1 billion investment from Apple revealed late 2024.
  • The filing follows a recent patent for much more stable satellite connectivity.

A related filing in France seems in some way connected with Apple (more below).

Better networking by design

Manufactured by Canada’s MDA Space, the next-generation C3 satellites feature a series of exciting sounding technologies, including dynamic beamforming and higher EIRP transit tech. But perhaps the most exciting thing is that they promise more robust signal strength on the ground. 

“Given this greater signal strength and the availability of multiple satellites overhead, users will have access to much-improved in-building and in-vehicle connectivity with less dependency on antenna orientation,” the filing said. 

If you’ve used any of Apple’s satellite services, you’ll know that doing so involves a user raising their iPhone toward the sky and moving around to find the optimal connection. That experience seems set to improve.

Building out Apple’s satellite services

Can better connectivity enable Apple to enhance its satellite services? That’s not impossible. While it doesn’t promise anything too specific, Globalstar does tell us the satellites will let it expand the products and services it does provide, including “new, innovative direct-to-device satellite features on supported devices, such as Apple’s iPhones.” Globalstar also says the system will enable it to offer additional commercial/enterprise IoT and consumer-based services. 

iPhone users in the US can use satellites to share Messages. The filing suggests this will become a more global service: “Globalstar connectivity will be at the fingertips of hundreds of millions of people when their need to communicate is not met by terrestrial infrastructure.” That’s a pretty clear promise of more to come, possibly to new forms of data connection, or perhaps the extension of existing satellite services to other devices, such as Apple Watch

Apple’s blue skies thinking

One more thing. The FCC request refers to an International Telecoms Union filing which describes a network of more than 8,000 satellites and includes satellite frequencies used by Globalstar. That filing was originally made on behalf of France’s Airbus, but Satnews reports this was transferred to CCC Communication Holdings France, a French business entity that seems to be managed by a senior Apple corporate director, Ronald Denwood. 

Denwood previously held directorships in Voysis, Ikinema, Stamplay, and OperateData, all of which were companies acquired by Apple at some point. It’s important not to read too much into that, but it does seem fair to speculate that Denwood’s involvement in CCC Communication Holdings France might illustrate the strategic importance of Apple’s satellite plans.

It’s worth noting that with the satellites offering a lifespan of just 12.5 years, whatever intentions Apple does have are likely to become more apparent in a relatively short time if the company intends to monetize its multi-billion dollar satellite investments before the birds retire. Meanwhile, of course, you can expect to be able to send messages even from within connectivity dead zones.

You can follow me on social media! Join me on BlueSky,  LinkedInMastodon, and MeWe

More used Seagate HDDs disguised as new: Fraudsters make it tough to spot the difference

The controversy surrounding used Seagate hard drives has significantly widened, with fraudsters now targeting the company’s IronWolf and IronWolf Pro NAS drives alongside the previously affected Exos server-grade HDDs.

According to recent investigations, fraudsters have developed more sophisticated methods to manipulate used drives to make them appear new, making detection increasingly challenging for buyers.