Download the November 2024 issue of the Enterprise Spotlight from the editors of CIO, Computerworld, CSO, InfoWorld, and Network World.
Page 28 of 101
Microsoft delays Recall rollout to December
Microsoft has delayed the rollout of its Windows Recall feature. The controversial feature — which takes regular screenshots of a user’s desktop screen — is now slated to launch in preview in December
Microsoft unveiled Recall in May, and initially intended to release it to Windows Insiders in June. Those plans were put on hold as Microsoft addressed data security and privacy concerns raised by experts about Recall, with a new release date set for October.
Microsoft said it had again postponed Recall’s release as it continues working on the feature.
“We are committed to delivering a secure and trusted experience with Recall,” Brandon LeBlanc, senior product manager of Windows, said in a statement. “To ensure we deliver on these important updates, we’re taking additional time to refine the experience before previewing it with Windows Insiders.
“Originally planned for October, Recall will now be available for preview with Windows Insiders on Copilot Plus PCs by December.”
Pitched as an “explorable timeline of your PC’s past,” Recall has drew criticism from security and privacy experts, with some likening the feature to keylogging software. When enabled, Recall will record all user actions Copilot+ PCs, taking “snapshots” of the screen at five-second intervals. Users can then search a timeline of everything they’ve interacted with on their device, whether that’s an application, website, document, image, or anything else.
Microsoft outlined plans to enhance security and privacy plans to enhance security and privacy measures in September. For instance, Recall is now opt-in, so Copilot+ PC users must turn the feature on or it won’t be record their screen. Biometric authentication is also required via Windows Hello each time a user wants to use Recall, and content filtering to prevent recording of sensitive data such as credit card details is turned on by default.
Microsoft reportedly delays Recall rollout to December
Microsoft has delayed the rollout of its Windows Recall feature, according to a report from The Verge. The controversial feature — which takes regular screenshots of a user’s desktop screen — is now slated to launch in preview in December
Microsoft unveiled Recall in May, and initially intended to release it to Windows Insiders in June. Those plans were put on hold as Microsoft addressed data security and privacy concerns raised by experts about Recall, with a new release date set for October.
According to The Verge, Microsoft again postponed Recall’s release as it continues working on the feature.
“We are committed to delivering a secure and trusted experience with Recall,” Brandon LeBlanc, senior product manager of Windows, said in a statement to The Verge. “To ensure we deliver on these important updates, we’re taking additional time to refine the experience before previewing it with Windows Insiders.
“Originally planned for October, Recall will now be available for preview with Windows Insiders on Copilot Plus PCs by December.”
Pitched as an “explorable timeline of your PC’s past,” Recall has drew criticism from security and privacy experts, with some likening the feature to keylogging software. When enabled, Recall will record all user actions Copilot+ PCs, taking “snapshots” of the screen at five-second intervals. Users can then search a timeline of everything they’ve interacted with on their device, whether that’s an application, website, document, image, or anything else.
Microsoft outlined plans to enhance security and privacy plans to enhance security and privacy measures in September. For instance, Recall is now opt-in, so Copilot+ PC users must turn the feature on or it won’t be record their screen. Biometric authentication is also required via Windows Hello each time a user wants to use Recall, and content filtering to prevent recording of sensitive data such as credit card details is turned on by default.
Agentic AI swarms are headed your way
Developers are already using multiple large language model (LLM) and other generative AI-based tools in the creation of automation tools. And soon, the tools will be able to use each other.
A new development in AI “swarms” serves as a wake up call for everyone involved in cybersecurity, automation and, in fact, IT generally: OpenAI’s Swarm.
What is OpenAI Swarm?
OpenAI launched an experimental framework last month called Swarm. It’s a “lightweight” system for the development of agentic AI swarms, which are networks of autonomous AI agents able to work together to handle complex tasks without human intervention, according to OpenAI.
(I wrote about agentic AI, but not swarming agents, in July.)
Swarm is not a product. It’s an experimental tool for coordinating or orchestrating networks of AI agents. The framework is open-source under the MIT license (which allows Python developers to use, modify, and distribute the software with minimal restrictions), and available on GitHub.
In the GitHub readme section, OpenAI says:
“Swarm is currently an experimental sample framework intended to explore ergonomic interfaces for multi-agent systems. It is not intended to be used in production, and therefore has no official support. (This also means we will not be reviewing PRs or issues!)
The primary goal of Swarm is to showcase the handoff & routines patterns explored in the Orchestrating Agents: Handoffs & Routines cookbook. It is not meant as a standalone library and is primarily for educational purposes.”
Swarm is not totally unique. Other existing systems can be used for the orchestration of multiple agents, which approaches the functioning of agentic AI swarms. Though not explicitly designed for swarming, they can be used for making AI agents interact with each other to varying degrees. These include: Microsoft AutoGen, CrewAI, LangChain, LangGraph, MetaGPT, AutoGPT, and Haystack.
While Swarm might be designed for simplicity and relative ease of use, all these other tools are more robust, reliable, supported and ready for prime-time.
OpenAI apparently launched Swarm to explore methods for improving agent collaboration through “routines” and “handoffs.” In this case, “routines” are predefined sets of instructions that guide agents through tasks or workflows. They serve as recipes for agents to follow, which adds control and predictability to multi-agent systems. “Handoffs” enable one agent to delegate a job to another based on the current context. For example, if the agent requires something specific that can be better handled by an agent specializing in that task, it can delegate it. That “handoff” provides the history of the task to the new agent, so it has context under which to proceed.
One characteristic of Swarm is that it’s stateless, so agents don’t remember anything from previous interactions. That simplifying element also limits the tool to simpler tasks. (Developers can, however, build solutions that do enable memory between agent interactions.)
While Swarm isn’t intended for actual production (and OpenAI won’t maintain it going forward), the fact that it’s dabbling in the concept is one indication that agent swarms could eventually become commonplace.
It also points to a trend in which agent swarm technology becomes increasingly usable and, for lack of a better term, democratized.
The right tool for the job?
One way to look at agentic AI swarming technology is that it’s the next powerful phase in the evolution of generative AI (genAI). In fact, Swarm is built on OpenAI’s Chat Completions API, which uses LLMs like GPT-4.
The API is designed to facilitate interactive “conversations” with AI models. It allows developers to create chatbots, interactive agents, and other applications that can engage in natural language conversations.
Today, developers are creating what you might call one-off AI tools that do one specific task. Agentic AI would enable developers to create a large number of such tools that specialize in different specific tasks, and then enable each tool to dragoon any others into service if the agent decides the task would be better handled by the other kind of tool. These tool types could include:
- 1. RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation): Enhancing text generation with relevant retrieved information. Basically, these agents would be tasked to “Google it” and return to the task at hand with that found information.
- 2. NL2SQL: Converting natural language queries into SQL commands.
- 3. Text Generation: Creating various forms of written content.
- 4. Code Generation: Producing code based on natural language descriptions.
- 5. Data Analysis: Processing and interpreting large datasets.
- 6. Image Generation: Creating images from text prompts.
- 7. Speech Synthesis: Converting text to spoken audio.
- 8. Language Translation: Translating between different languages.
- 9. Summarization: Condensing long-form content into concise summaries.
- 10. Dialogue Management: Handling multi-turn conversations in chatbots.
Instead of the user making choices, opening new tools and essentially serving as the guide and glue for complex AI-based tasks, the agents would do all this autonomously.
Easy-to-use swarms of AI agents — what could go wrong?
It’s clear that agentic AI swarms could seriously boost enterprise productivity, offloading chores from people, enabling them to focus on higher-level responsibilities.
The risks are also clear. Take security, for example.
At present, as far as we know, no nation-state or state-sponsored hackers are using agentic AI swarms. But that day is surely coming.
Hostile nation states are using LLMs in general, and even ChatGPT in particular, for malicious rreconnaissance and research, scripting and coding, social-engineering and phishing content, language translation, and detection evasion.
At present, people working for these nation states are doing individual hacking, and using LLMs as part of their knowledge toolset, manually prompt-engineering chatbots, then using the returned results in their breach attempts.
In an agentic AI swarm future, state-sponsored hackers will be able to create individual specialist AI agents to do each of these tasks, and enable the agents to call into play the other agents as needed. By removing the “bottleneck” of a human operator, malicious hacking can take place on a massive scale at blistering speed.
It’s reasonable to assume at this early stage that the most effective defense against agentic AI swarm attacks will be agentic AI swarm defenses.
Another area of concern is the risk of overcomplexity. Agentic AI, including agentic AI swarming technology, operates autonomously to pursue goals. It can be “creative,” or, more accurately, unpredictable in how it achieves goals given to it by the developers who create it and the users who deploy it. Because it’s autonomous, people might not know what it’s doing or how it’s doing it. And it’s possible to lose track of what agent swarms are doing, or even that they’re still operating.
Individual employees might automate their own work using agentic AI swarms they monitor close — agents that could continue running after the workers leaves the company (or gets hit by a bus).
Pessimistic (or realistic) prognosticators fear agentic AI swarms might even accelerate job losses because they’ll be so capable of operating like people do.
As with other new, powerful developments in AI technology, agentic AI swarms are packed with promise and peril.
What’s important to know about OpenAI’s Swarm is that it represents a move to simplify and democratize swarming agents. That probably means near-future exponential growth in the number of swarming agents in operation, and a rise in the expectation that tech pros will be using agentic AI agents for all manner of automation.
The agents are coming. I recommend you learn all about them before they get here.
Landing a tech job is tough: here’s how to beat the challenges in today’s market
Even with the US economy doing well by most measures, technology job seekers often find it difficult to get hired. It’s a conundrum.
The unemployment rate remains at near historic lows (from 2.5% to 3.8%, depending on the data source), but corporate layoffs have continued in earnest and some traditional IT skills are often no longer in demand. Online hiring platform Indeed recently found that tech jobs including software development remain 30% below 2020 levels, and that 79% tech workers feel pressure to upskill because of the rise of generative AI.
Those kinds of changes have prompted more workers to cast about for new jobs; this year, 34% of survey respondents said they are actively looking for work, up 11% from 2023. (The same percentage said they’re worried about layoffs in the next year, and four in 10 said if their company makes job cuts, they expect to be affected.)
Job data over the past two years have been a mixed bag of good times and bad; 260,000 tech workers were laid off in 2023, with another 142,000 getting pink slips so far this year, according to Layoffs.fyi. At the same time, US unemployment data released last month showed unexpected growth overall for tech job listings and hiring, along with a marked shift in the kind of workers organizations need — AI talent is no longer at the top of the list.
So what’s going on?
“While the labor market overall is performing well and unemployment is low, some sectors are doing much better than others,” said Allison Shrivastava, an economic research associate at Indeed’s Hiring Lab.
IT and tech-related sectors expanded during the post-pandemic boom, with job postings in software development reaching well above pre-pandemic levels, according to Shrivastava. Some of the decline in hiring now could be a correction to that rapid expansion.
“These sectors are also pretty costly to hire in, both in terms of time and money, so employers could be more cautious in expanding their employee base, favoring a wait-and-see approach while the labor market settles,” she said.
Janco Associates
ZipRecruiter’s latest Job Seeker Confidence Index has dropped to its lowest level since the index began in early 2022, with job seekers’ confidence in the labor market and their own financial wellbeing down sharply. Fully 41% of job hunters said it’s now much harder to find a job and slightly more, 43%, said their search is going poorly, ZipRecruiter found. Only 13% described their job hunt as going well.
Fewer opportunities for some, more for others
More than half of job seekers (53%) said there are fewer opportunities than just six months ago, and 34% have had to expand their search outside their usual field, ZipRecruiter said. Part of those frustrations could be because the mix of companies that are hiring has changed.
Industry observers say smaller organizations have been scooping up talent left in the wake of more than two-years’ worth of layoffs by bigger corporations. That could explain why the number of unemployed IT professionals in the US dropped last month from 148,000 to 98,000, according to IT industry consultancy Janco Associates, which drew its findings from a US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data for Septermber.)
Indeed
By Janco’s tally, more than 78,000 IT pros were hired in September, cutting into unemployment. “IT pros who were unemployed last month found jobs more quickly than was anticipated, as CIOs rushed to fill open positions,” said Janco CEO Victor Janulaitis. “Our analysis predicts the same will be the case for the next several months.”
Janco pegged the September unemployment rate for IT workers at 3.8%, down from 6% in August and now below the overall national unemployment rate of 4.1%.
“The moving average of the number of unfilled jobs for IT professionals peaked in January, and has steadily declined to 45,000 in September,” Janulaitis said. “Most of those positions are for new technologies. IT pros having a legacy application focus are finding few opportunities.”
How to get hired
Of the tech workers open to new opportunities, nearly 80% say they would consider relocation, a 10% increase from 2023. Tech talent is also taking control of their hiring journey, with 61% in 2024 finding roles on their own compared to 55% who did so in 2023. This indicates a shift away from reliance on recruiters and personal networks, according to Indeed.
Linsey Fagan, a senior talent strategy advisor at Indeed, noted that the tech job market is currently seeing decreased job volume and an influx of talent, making it a unique challenge for job seekers to find suitable roles.
But there are a few key steps job seekers can take to improve their chances of success, according to Fagan — beginning with upskilling.
Indeed
“Technologies like Rust, Go, Google Cloud Platform, Terraform, and AWS are experiencing a surge in demand, but have relatively few job seekers compared to open roles,” Fagan said. “Learning these skills can give candidates a significant advantage in securing roles in this dynamic landscape.”
According to Indeed, the fastest-growing areas in tech at the moment are software development, generative AI, and cybersecurity, where despite high demand, there remains a shortage of experts.
Freelance employment platform Upwork found similar trends in a recently released study of freelance worker earnings for all of 2023; it found “unprecedented” growth in importance for genAI and data science and analytics skills.
Indeed
The genAI factor
In the US and Europe, as many as 300 million jobs could be threatened by some form of AI over the next few years, according to a March research note by investment bank Goldman Sachs. Fully two-thirds of US jobs could be partially automated through AI, and up to one in four current work tasks could be completely automated by AI, Goldman Sachs said.
Indeed
In particular, roles that require repetitive data entry, legal administration, careers involving math skills — even healthcare jobs — will all be impacted by AI’s adoption. Amid that backdrop, job seekers should ask a potential employer if they offer upskilling opportunities, as 89% of tech professionals use company-provided training opportunities to keep their skills up to date, according to Fagan.
“…With genAI gaining momentum, tech professionals feel pressure to upskill,” she said. “Most employers offer tuition reimbursement or upskilling opportunities, so it would be a missed opportunity not to take advantage. Additionally, adapting and integrating AI into workflows is becoming essential. By staying open to upskilling, particularly in high-demand areas and in AI integration, and considering flexibility in work location, tech job seekers can better navigate today’s tech job market.”
Tech professionals with five to 10 years of experience are more likely to apply for internal roles rather than outside their current company, underlining the need for companies to invest in upskilling. Sixty-six percent of employees say they are likely to remain at a company with mentorship programs, according to Indeed’s survey.
While work flexibility remains a top priority for many job seekers, it’s important for tech job seekers to be open-minded about hybrid or on-site work if they are looking to find a job quickly. “Our research found that professionals who work on-site about four days per week tend to want to stay with their employers, likely due to the collaboration and sense of community fostered by in-person interactions,” Fagan said.
How to completely customize your Android Quick Settings panel
When we talk about Android customization, we tend to focus on the home screen and the ocean of exceptional Android launchers that let you take total control of that environment.
But the beauty of Android is that the opportunity for making your phone work the way you want isn’t limited to any one area of the operating system. Unlike with that (cough, cough) other smartphone platform, you can customize and control practically every part of the Android experience to make it exactly right for you — instead of being forced to blindly follow the path some sweater-vested executive in an ostentatious spaceship office has chosen simply because he thinks it’s “elegant.”
Few Android-appreciating animals realize it, but that Google-given freedom of ours extends even into Android’s Quick Settings panel — that series of one-tap tiles you see when you swipe down twice from the top of your screen. In addition to expanding which specific shortcuts appear in that area, you can completely customize the very way that area of Android looks and works. And in doing so, you can make it especially efficient and functional for your personal style of working.
It’s basically like using a custom launcher — only for your Quick Settings instead of your home screen. And once you know where to look, the possibilities are practically endless.
Here, specifically, are two Quick Settings customization paths well worth exploring.
[Ready to push your Android Intelligence quotient even higher? Check out my new Android Notification Power-Pack to discover six powerful enhancements that’ll change how you use your phone.]
Android Quick Settings customization path #1: The simple replacement
The first tool I want to introduce you to is essentially the Nova Launcher of Android Quick Settings customization.
It’s called Power Shade, and just as Nova or any other launcher does on the home screen, it completely replaces your device’s entire default Quick Settings setup with something much more feature-filled and customizable.
Among other things, Power Shade empowers you to:
- Choose exactly what shape and size all of your Quick Settings tiles take — and, consequently, how many of ’em end up being visible at once in that initial swipe-down view
- Fine-tune the color palette, style, and all-around appearance of your Quick Settings panel
- And even change the behavior of the Android swipe-down gesture, so that just a single swipe can open up the entire Quick Settings and notification panel, if you want
JR Raphael, IDG
Power Shade works by taking over the standard Android swipe-down gesture and loading its interface in place of your device’s default. Because of that, the mechanism isn’t flawless — once in a while, you’ll get a quick glimpse of your standard Quick Settings setup behind the Power Shade replacement — but the system has generally worked quite smoothly and consistently for me throughout my tests on a variety of different devices.
JR Raphael, IDG
Power Shade is free to use in its base form, with an optional premium version that activates some advanced options and eliminates some mildly annoying ads throughout its configuration tool. You really don’t need the premium path to enjoy the app, but if you do decide to make the leap, be sure to look for the lifetime license, not the ongoing subscription plan. (The lifetime key is 10 bucks and seems to show up as an option only on occasion. If you wait a bit, you’ll probably get an offer to buy it for $2 at some point, too.)
The app does require some relatively deep system permissions, but they’re all genuinely required for what it needs to do. And its privacy policy is clear about the fact that it doesn’t collect or share any personal data.
Android Quick Settings customization path #2: The total makeover
If Power Shade is the jack-of-all-trades Nova Launcher of Android Quick Settings customization, this next option is the Square Home — a super-specific setup that aims to emulate what other environments offer while also adding in a healthy pinch of extra functionality and control.
It’s called Mi Control Center, and it draws on inspiration from both iOS and the popular Xiaomi MIUI flavor of Android to bring a distinctive and extremely different look ‘n’ feel to that area of the Android interface.
The key to this approach is that swiping down from the left side of the screen opens up your notifications while swiping down from the right reveals an Apple-like “Control Center” (a.k.a. Quick Settings) panel.
JR Raphael, IDG
Just like with Power Shade, though, you can customize and control practically every aspect of the experience — down to the tiniest of details around exactly how the setup looks and works. You can even adjust the precise dividing point for where a swipe triggers notifications vs. the “Control Center,” if you really want to get intricate.
JR Raphael, IDG
Mi Control Center is free to use at its base level, with an optional $10/week (!!) premium subscription to unlock certain advanced features and remove ads throughout the configuration tool. You definitely don’t need that, and I absolutely wouldn’t pay that much for it. If the developer ever offers a more reasonably priced upgrade, it might be worth considering. In the meantime, the free version should be more than enough for most people and purposes.
Like Power Shade, Mi Control Center does require a fair amount of permissions — but, once more, the app wouldn’t be able to operate and do what it needs to do without ’em. And, again, its privacy policy indicates that nothing of any significance is ever stored or shared.
So there ya have it: two potential-packed paths with limitless options for customizing your Android device’s Quick Settings panel and making it your own. Throw in some extra-useful tile additions and then spruce up the status bar above it, and you’ll effectively be carrying a new and drastically improved device — without having spent a single shiny dime.
Keep the customization coming with my Android Notification Power-Pack — six powerful enhancements for the notification panel on any Android device — next!
Mullenweg ‘would love to go back to negotiating table’ with WP Engine
While lawyers argue in the WP Engine versus Automattic litigation whether the hyperbole should be believed, the continuing battle of words, almost all nasty ones, is starting to raise doubts how much an enterprise should rely on open source. And even if open source can be avoided at all in late 2024.
The latest legal documents came from Automattic, which argued that its people did nothing wrong and that the blame lies solely with WP Engine. This arrived after months of a wide range of heated comments from both sides.
One key point of disagreement involves WP Engine being denied access to WordPress.org. WP Engine has argued that the denial blocked it from getting work done, but Automattic (which controls both WordPress.org and WordPress.com) argues the move didn’t meaningfully hurt WP Engine.
Microsoft reports better-than-expected results; AI products show record growth
Microsoft’s second quarter results beat analysts’ expectations. as revenue increased by 16% to $ 65.6 billion — higher than the $64.5 billion analysts had expected. Net income rose 11% to $ 24.67 billion.
Following major investments in AI, revenue from the Azure cloud business is now up 33%.
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said in a comment that the company’s AI business will soon be worth $ 10 billion a year, making it the fastest product category to reach that milestone, Axios reports.
Revenue from server products and cloud services increased by 23%, with revenue from the Microsoft 365 commercial products and cloud services up by 13% for the quarter.
Get-back-to-your-desk mandates spark office refill revolution
As the pandemic eased in 2022 and 2023, US core business centers in large and small cities continued to suffer the after effects or remote- and hybrid-work policies, which led to a 20% to 40% reduction in office space use and a devaluation of properties. The big switch to remote work left many downtowns largely empty for months.
Since then, commercial areas have seen a slow but steady return to the office, with average office occupancy rate hitting more than 60%.
Still, many offices remain partially or completely empty.
“We are approaching 20 quarters of contraction in the office market,” according to Peter Miscovich, global future of work leader at Jones Lang LaSalle IP (JLL), a commercial real estate and investment management services firm. “There are signs of stabilization of vacancies in certain parts of the country.”
One trend affecting the repopulation of corporate cubicles involves a rash of return-to-office (RTO) mandates. Last month, for example, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy told employees to get back into the office five days a week beginning in early 2025. Ericsson recently tightened its policy for office attendance, too — a decision it later decided was made too quickly.
Earlier this year, Dell Technologies ordered many workers to return to their corporate desks, and more recently told its global sales team to work in office five days a week. And just last week, 3M ordered senior employees back to corporate headquarters.
According to one recent survey, most companies are pushing for RTO mandates in 2025. The survey by ResumeBuilder found that nine in 10 companies will enact RTO mandates based on data from 764 companies that transitioned to a fully remote work model during the pandemic. But the data is nuanced. Not all RTO policies, of course, require employees to be in the office five days a week.
Kastle
“There’s only 25% of companies, overall, seeking RTO five days per week, and the remaining 75% are involved in various forms of hybrid or hybrid/remote and my forecast is that hybrid will endure,” Miscovich said.
The ResumeBuilder survey results were similar to Miscovich’s findings. The majority of companies are operating with a hybrid model, while 30% require employees to be in the office full-time.
Office occupancy rates fell from 100% in February 2020, at the start of the pandemic’s stay-at-home orders, to just 14% by April of that same year. Over the next four years, those rates have slowly climbed as companies embraced hybrid work policies. But on average, occupancy never fully returned to 100%, according to Kastle Systems, a provider of security key fob technology for 2,600 buildings in 138 US cities.
Recent data shows occupancy rates are again climbing. In January, the peak occupancy rate of US office buildings stood around 46% based on a 10-city average, according to Kastle. Today, more than 61% of buildings are occupied in those same 10 large cities. And cities such as Austin and Houston are seeing occupancy rates as high as 77% to 71%, respectively. Chicago’s office building occupancy rate stands at 69%.
Peak occupancy rates are only half the story. “Peak” relates to days when offices are most full, such as on Mondays and Tuesdays. On less popular days, such as Fridays, office occupancy rates dipped as low as 33% this month.
Kastle
Despite the rise in occupancy rates, office values remain depressed compared to before the pandemic, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). It found there has been a 39% decline in office building values since 2020 — and a large percentage of pre-pandemic leases will come up for renewal in the next few years. That could force some companies to more closely evaluate their office needs.
The COVID pandemic served as something of an unintentional experiment that revealed a host of uncomfortable workplace truths — namely, that most employees always preferred remote work and at-home knowledge workers were just as, if not more, productive. Another realization: working in the office, by default, isn’t as rewarding some people as it is for others, according to Phil Kirschner, an associate partner in McKinsey & Co.’s real estate and people and organizational performance practices.
Not everyone, for example, feels the same level of inclusion and equality in an office setting. “Diverse populations of almost any measure — whether skin color, sexual orientation, physical disability — are affected by in-office requirements, and there’s a higher desire for workplace flexibility either when taking a job or the likelihood to leave a job if you’re not offered it,” Kirschner said in an earlier interview with Computerworld.
Higher quality buildings, such as those that are newer and have more amenities, have fared better of late. That’s prompted a rush to build or renovate older offices that not only have newer amenities and mixed-use spaces (such as combined office, shopping and recreational facilities) but updated technology to better support remote and hybrid workers.
But older properties with fewer amenities could suffer. In particular, Class B, Class C and even lower-end Class A grade buildings could see the biggest valuation declines in the current market; those who are leasing or buying space now want top-notch AAA buildings — those with the latest amenities, technologies, and locations.
“There’s a potential space shortage in certain districts and locations,” Miscovich said. “Even three-days a week in the office is affecting demand. We are seeing demand for that high-quality space, but there’s also the surplus of the obsolete, class B- or C buildings that are not serving the workforce of the future.”
Leading the return-to-office trend are legal firms, financial services organizations, defense contractors, and industrial companies seeking to expand their footprint as the result of business demands.
“And, then the technology sector is picking up in places where they have AI talent demands and key urban centers for tech talent,” Miscovich said. “Technology is fascinating because you have some firms becoming more office centric and others are still offering more of a hybrid approach. We’ll see how that sector plays out over the next couple of years.”
Miscovich describes the pandemic was “an accelerant” and “time machine” that moved the US workforce 10 years into the future in just two years. Remote work was inevitable with the evolution of the digital economy, and the pandemic showed the promise of hybrid and distributed work.
Now workplace design, leadership, culture, workplace practices, change management, hybrid workplace technologies — all need to mature as we go forward beyond the post pandemic world, he said.
“The future of work will be distributed; it will be diverse and it will be dynamic. I think the RTO mandates occurring are for individual companies in that 25% range,” Miscovich said. “That may increase to 30%, but our point of view is hybrid work will endure for the longer term. We have some clients that by 2027 or 2030 may have a portion of their workforce in office five days a week and another portion of their workforce at three days a week or three days a month.
“I don’t think there will be ever a future steady state, just given the dynamism of artificial intelligence, talent and distributed work,” he said. “I think we’ll see a continuous evolution and continuous learning mind set relative to future of work strategies.”
Get-back-to-your-desk mandates spark office refill revolution
As the pandemic eased in 2022 and 2023, US core business centers in large and small cities continued to suffer the after effects or remote- and hybrid-work policies, which led to a 20% to 40% reduction in office space use and a devaluation of properties. The big switch to remote work left many downtowns largely empty for months.
Since then, commercial areas have seen a slow but steady return to the office, with average office occupancy rate hitting more than 60%.
Still, many offices remain partially or completely empty.
“We are approaching 20 quarters of contraction in the office market,” according to Peter Miscovich, global future of work leader at Jones Lang LaSalle IP (JLL), a commercial real estate and investment management services firm. “There are signs of stabilization of vacancies in certain parts of the country.”
One trend affecting the repopulation of corporate cubicles involves a rash of return-to-office (RTO) mandates. Last month, for example, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy told employees to get back into the office five days a week beginning in early 2025. Ericsson recently tightened its policy for office attendance, too — a decision it later decided was made too quickly.
Earlier this year, Dell Technologies ordered many workers to return to their corporate desks, and more recently told its global sales team to work in office five days a week. And just last week, 3M ordered senior employees back to corporate headquarters.
According to one recent survey, most companies are pushing for RTO mandates in 2025. The survey by ResumeBuilder found that nine in 10 companies will enact RTO mandates based on data from 764 companies that transitioned to a fully remote work model during the pandemic. But the data is nuanced. Not all RTO policies, of course, require employees to be in the office five days a week.
Kastle
“There’s only 25% of companies, overall, seeking RTO five days per week, and the remaining 75% are involved in various forms of hybrid or hybrid/remote and my forecast is that hybrid will endure,” Miscovich said.
The ResumeBuilder survey results were similar to Miscovich’s findings. The majority of companies are operating with a hybrid model, while 30% require employees to be in the office full-time.
Office occupancy rates fell from 100% in February 2020, at the start of the pandemic’s stay-at-home orders, to just 14% by April of that same year. Over the next four years, those rates have slowly climbed as companies embraced hybrid work policies. But on average, occupancy never fully returned to 100%, according to Kastle Systems, a provider of security key fob technology for 2,600 buildings in 138 US cities.
Recent data shows occupancy rates are again climbing. In January, the peak occupancy rate of US office buildings stood around 46% based on a 10-city average, according to Kastle. Today, more than 61% of buildings are occupied in those same 10 large cities. And cities such as Austin and Houston are seeing occupancy rates as high as 77% to 71%, respectively. Chicago’s office building occupancy rate stands at 69%.
Peak occupancy rates are only half the story. “Peak” relates to days when offices are most full, such as on Mondays and Tuesdays. On less popular days, such as Fridays, office occupancy rates dipped as low as 33% this month.
Kastle
Despite the rise in occupancy rates, office values remain depressed compared to before the pandemic, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). It found there has been a 39% decline in office building values since 2020 — and a large percentage of pre-pandemic leases will come up for renewal in the next few years. That could force some companies to more closely evaluate their office needs.
The COVID pandemic served as something of an unintentional experiment that revealed a host of uncomfortable workplace truths — namely, that most employees always preferred remote work and at-home knowledge workers were just as, if not more, productive. Another realization: working in the office, by default, isn’t as rewarding some people as it is for others, according to Phil Kirschner, an associate partner in McKinsey & Co.’s real estate and people and organizational performance practices.
Not everyone, for example, feels the same level of inclusion and equality in an office setting. “Diverse populations of almost any measure — whether skin color, sexual orientation, physical disability — are affected by in-office requirements, and there’s a higher desire for workplace flexibility either when taking a job or the likelihood to leave a job if you’re not offered it,” Kirschner said in an earlier interview with Computerworld.
Higher quality buildings, such as those that are newer and have more amenities, have fared better of late. That’s prompted a rush to build or renovate older offices that not only have newer amenities and mixed-use spaces (such as combined office, shopping and recreational facilities) but updated technology to better support remote and hybrid workers.
But older properties with fewer amenities could suffer. In particular, Class B, Class C and even lower-end Class A grade buildings could see the biggest valuation declines in the current market; those who are leasing or buying space now want top-notch AAA buildings — those with the latest amenities, technologies, and locations.
“There’s a potential space shortage in certain districts and locations,” Miscovich said. “Even three-days a week in the office is affecting demand. We are seeing demand for that high-quality space, but there’s also the surplus of the obsolete, class B- or C buildings that are not serving the workforce of the future.”
Leading the return-to-office trend are legal firms, financial services organizations, defense contractors, and industrial companies seeking to expand their footprint as the result of business demands.
“And, then the technology sector is picking up in places where they have AI talent demands and key urban centers for tech talent,” Miscovich said. “Technology is fascinating because you have some firms becoming more office centric and others are still offering more of a hybrid approach. We’ll see how that sector plays out over the next couple of years.”
Miscovich describes the pandemic was “an accelerant” and “time machine” that moved the US workforce 10 years into the future in just two years. Remote work was inevitable with the evolution of the digital economy, and the pandemic showed the promise of hybrid and distributed work.
Now workplace design, leadership, culture, workplace practices, change management, hybrid workplace technologies — all need to mature as we go forward beyond the post pandemic world, he said.
“The future of work will be distributed; it will be diverse and it will be dynamic. I think the RTO mandates occurring are for individual companies in that 25% range,” Miscovich said. “That may increase to 30%, but our point of view is hybrid work will endure for the longer term. We have some clients that by 2027 or 2030 may have a portion of their workforce in office five days a week and another portion of their workforce at three days a week or three days a month.
“I don’t think there will be ever a future steady state, just given the dynamism of artificial intelligence, talent and distributed work,” he said. “I think we’ll see a continuous evolution and continuous learning mind set relative to future of work strategies.”